Google China Censoring or NOT?
Sunday, January 29th, 2006Are our fellow bloggers taking up some of the Main Stream Media’s habits of reporting only the juiciest information even when it might be far from the truth? I took a little closer look at the JunkYardBlog story on Google’s censoring of the Google.cn web search engine. While the JunkYadBlog did a great job of showing how images.google.cn is filtered, they did not bother to tell what the main Google.cn search engine returns when plugging in things like the word “Christian”. It seems that the main Google.cn search engine actually returns more hits than the US version of Google when searching on the word Christian. Why make such a big deal over the images site and skip the fact that the main search engine seems to not reflect such an anti-Christian sentiment?
I got 251 Million hits on Google.cn when searching for Christian
I got 201 Million hits on Google.com when searching for Christian
Why not report this? Is this a case of a blog gone MSM? Why not share these facts Mr. Preston?
I also wondered what would happen if you took some of the terms that are likely being censored and translated them to Chinese and then run the search again on Google.cn. I did come up with very different results. I got less than 64 million results when I searched for “Jesus” on Google.com. You can click on the images below to see the actual current search engine results.
I then searched for “Jesus” in English on Google.cn. I got just over 93 million results.

Then I translated “Jesus” into Chinese using the Google Language Translate page. Next I searched Google.cn for the translated version of Jesus. I got 1.7 million results.

This example of the differences in the Chinese version of the Google Search engine and the regular Google.com site does not confirm censorship at all. I am really surprised that Michele Malkin didn’t catch this, but rather played right along by stating, “Searching for Christ in China - Google won’t be of much help”.
Here is another one reported on the JunkYardBlog that only mentioned the images.goolge.cn results.
JunkYardBlog reported:
On a clean search, Google-China turned up 10 hits on an image search for jesus christ. Just like that, no quotes. By comparison, the US version of Google image search turns up 168,000 hits on the same exact search terms. 168,000 versus 10. And this is just an image search.
Why didn’t the JunkYardBlog go ahead and report on a search using the main search engines of Google.cn verses Google.com for the term “Jesus Christ”? Because it would not have been as sensational of a story, that’s why. Here is how it would have read if they had included the main search engines of Google instead of only using the images search. On a clean search, Google-China turned up 32 million hits on a search for Jesus Christ. Just like that, no quotes. By comparison, the US version of Google search turns up 29.6 million hits on the same exact search terms. 32 million versus 29.6 million.
The JunkYardBlog says:
This is a very serious issue. Google has put its financial bottom line over basic human rights. An American company is assisting the Chinese government in a Stalinistic airbrushing of faith from the internet. That Google is helping Beijing wipe Jesus Christ off the web…
I say this is a very serious issue too. Is this a case of a blog trying to draw in readers using a partial truths? Is this the whole truth or only enough of the truth that will capture the attention of the likes of Michelle Malkin to get a little link love?
Update: Google China Censorship and Google Business Decision








